COVID-19 ALERT: We are OPEN for business! We are working remotely during our normal business hours: Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m. To get in touch call: 215-246-9400 or email: info@hykellaw.com and we will get back to you within 36 business hours or less. 

Is it a Crime to Encourage Undocumented Immigrants?

border-bottom-min

The Supreme Court made headlines today when it announced it would hear The United States v. Sineneng-Smith. 

The Sineneng-Smith case has two parts, one of which is settled and one of which is not. Sineneng-Smith ran an immigration help business out of California. She defrauded immigrants by charging them an excessive amount of money to apply to a program she knew was no longer in effect. That Sineneng-Smith committed fraud is not in dispute.

What is in dispute is a conviction for a violation of Section 1324 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which makes it a crime to “encourage or induce an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of the law.”

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the fraud conviction but overturned the encouragement conviction. The government responded by filing a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court granted cert. in early October.

The question presented: “Whether the federal criminal prohibition against encouraging or inducing illegal immigration for commercial advantage or private financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1324(1)(1)(A)(iv) is facially unconstitutional.”

This isn’t the first time this law has been in the news. Last year, the Trump Administration began using these laws against uncooperative officials in sanctuary cities.

Advocates fear upholding this law as unconstitutional could have a chilling effect on the ability of immigration lawyers, advocacy organizations, and others on providing normal services to their clients.

The ACLU filed an amicus brief citing instances of innocent behavior, like Kamala Harris’ tweet which encouraged immigrants to find safety from the California wildfires regardless of immigration status, would be illegal under this broadly written law. So could an immigration lawyer’s routine advice to client.

The brief cites a litany of case law and precedent to uphold its conclusions. It also neatly outlines the problems with using the law in the way it has been used in the Sineneng-Smith case.

“The 1st Amendment does not permit the government to punish advocacy of unlawful acts save in two narrow circumstances. Neither circumstance applies to Section 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv). First, the incitement doctrine permits the government to regulate speech that is intended and likely to elicit imminent violence. But section 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)’s prohibition on speech involves no violence, and broadly criminalizes all speech regardless of the likelihood and timing of such violation actually occurring. Second, the government may criminalize ‘speech integral to criminal conduct,’ but only when this speech is closely related and necessary to the commission of a crime, such as guiding an individual step-by-step through a false case filing.”

Good arguments, joined by many other voices who are filing briefs of their own.

Now all we have to find out is whether the Supreme Court agrees.

See also:

 In The News: Supreme Court to Hear Asylum Case

In The News: The Supreme Court Decision You Need to Know About

What is the Current Law on Claiming Asylum in the United States?

We Help Solve Immigration Challenges

How can we help you? Click on one of the boxes below to get started:

photo-1-min

Employment & Investment Visas

Although it often comes with controversy, immigration into the United States has always played a major role in the strength of its economy. Perhaps no one understands this more than the residents of Philadelphia, where the Liberty Bell still welcomes foreigners to one of the richest historical communities of our country.

photo-2-min

Family Visas

Not knowing or understanding the system and laws of the U.S. can be a disadvantage for many foreign immigrants who wish to obtain permanent residency in the United States, either for themselves or for their loved ones. Hykel Law’s Family-Based Immigration Services can lead you through the complicated process to achieve either temporary or permanent residency, depending on your situation.

photo-3-min

Deportation Defense

Are you afraid of deportation? If you are a foreign national involved in the beginning stages of removal proceedings, the deportation attorney at Hykel Law in Philadelphia can help prevent this unfortunate situation. We can evaluate your immigration case and find the best strategy to defend you from removal proceedings to help you stay in the United States.

Call Now ButtonCall Us Now